Ankit Malhotra

Lawyer
at Malhotra & Malhotra Associates
09417009209
Chandigarh
India

Visit company website

Ankit Malhotra is a double graduate in International Relations and Law from O.P. Jindal Global University, India. He received multiple awards for academic excellence and outstanding contributions. Malhotra completed two research theses on international law topics and assisted in designing a course on the International Court of Justice and India. He graduated from SOAS with an LLM as a Felix Scholar and served as a Special Rapporteur.

He has presented papers globally, participated in various international law societies, and he co-edited a book titled, “Re-Imagining the International Legal Order”. Malhotra is also a member of several international law associations and proficient in English, French and German.

Ankit Malhotra speaks English, French and German.
Subsidized legal aid is possible

Relevant experiences and positions

Decision making model

My relevant experiences and positions in the areas of child relocation, child abduction, and criminal law are informed by a comprehensive academic and professional background, combined with a deep commitment to the welfare of children and the intricacies of international law.

Some personal questions

What is your opinion on the law / case law on child relocation in your country?

In India, the legal framework surrounding child relocation is primarily governed by family law, with a strong emphasis on the child’s best interests. Indian courts follow the principle that the child’s welfare is paramount, which often supersedes the rights of the parents.

The leading case on child relocation in India is the Supreme Court decision in the case of Nithya Anand Raghavan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr., 2017. This case underscored the importance of considering the child’s best interests when deciding on relocation matters. The Supreme Court held that the welfare of the child is of paramount importance and that the decision should focus on the child’s comfort, security, and development.

The law in India requires a careful balance between the custodial parent’s right to relocate and the non-custodial parent’s right to maintain a meaningful relationship with the child. Courts typically look into various factors such as the reasons for relocation, the impact on the child’s education and social life, and the feasibility of maintaining the child’s relationship with the non-custodial parent through visitation arrangements.

In practice, judges in India are cautious and methodical in their approach to relocation cases. They often require substantial evidence to demonstrate that the move is in the child’s best interests. This includes psychological evaluations, school reports, and sometimes the child’s own views, depending on their age and maturity. In summary, the legal opinion on child relocation in India is one of careful deliberation, prioritizing the child’s overall well-being while balancing the rights and interests of both parents. Courts are inclined to grant relocation if it is clearly demonstrated that it will benefit the child, but they are equally vigilant in ensuring that the non-custodial parent’s rights are not unjustly compromised.

What should parents know before starting a court procedure about child relocation?

Before starting a court procedure about child relocation, parents should be well-prepared and informed about several critical aspects:

1. Best Interests of the Child: Courts prioritize the child’s welfare above all else. Parents should be ready to demonstrate how the relocation will benefit the child’s physical, emotional, and educational needs. This includes presenting a detailed plan for the child’s schooling, healthcare, and social environment in the new location.

2. Legal Requirements and Jurisdiction: Understand the specific legal standards and requirements in your jurisdiction. Different regions may have varying criteria for granting relocation requests. Familiarize yourself with relevant case law and statutes that could impact your case.

3. Evidence and Documentation: Gather comprehensive evidence to support the relocation. This includes job offers, housing arrangements, school enrollment information, and any other documents that show the move is well-planned and in the child’s best interests. Be prepared to provide evidence of how the relocation will improve the child’s quality of life.

4. Impact on the Non-Custodial Parent: Courts will consider the impact of the move on the child’s relationship with the non-custodial parent. Be prepared to propose realistic and feasible visitation schedules and methods for maintaining a strong relationship, such as virtual communication and travel arrangements.

5. Mediation and Negotiation: Before resorting to litigation, consider mediation as an alternative. Mediation can help both parties reach a mutually agreeable solution with less emotional and financial strain. Courts often view attempts at mediation favorably.

6. Legal Representation: Securing experienced legal representation is crucial. An attorney specializing in family law and child relocation can provide valuable guidance, help navigate complex legal processes, and advocate effectively on your behalf.

7. Emotional Preparedness: Be prepared for the emotional toll of relocation disputes. These cases can be highly contentious and stressful. Seeking support from a counselor or support groups can help manage the emotional challenges involved.

By understanding these key factors and preparing thoroughly, parents can approach the court procedure for child relocation with a stronger case and a clearer perspective on what to expect.

What makes a child abduction case different from other cases?

From an Indian perspective, child abduction cases are uniquely complex due to their cross-border nature and the interplay of multiple legal systems and international conventions. Unlike domestic cases, child abduction cases often involve the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which India has not yet ratified. This non-ratification adds a layer of complexity, as Indian courts must navigate international legal principles without the framework provided by the Hague Convention.

One of the key differences in child abduction cases is the urgency and sensitivity required in handling the matter. The primary focus is on the immediate and long-term welfare of the child, often necessitating swift judicial intervention to prevent further trauma or disruption in the child’s life. For instance, in the case of Nithya Anand Raghavan vs State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr. (2017), the Supreme Court of India emphasized the paramount importance of the child’s welfare over technicalities of jurisdiction and custody orders from foreign courts. The court held that the child’s welfare must be assessed independently, regardless of prior foreign judgments.

Furthermore, child abduction cases often involve an element of criminality, which distinguishes them from other civil family law matters. The wrongful removal or retention of a child by one parent against the will of the other can be seen as both a violation of custody rights and a potential criminal offense.

In Arathi Bandi vs Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao (2013), the Supreme Court underscored that child abduction by a parent is a grave concern and highlighted the need for a careful and compassionate approach to ensure the child’s best interests are protected while also considering the legal rights of both parents.
Additionally, these cases often require international cooperation and liaison between different jurisdictions, which can be legally and logistically challenging.

The non-custodial parent typically needs to initiate legal proceedings in a foreign country, navigate unfamiliar legal systems, and sometimes deal with language barriers and cultural differences.

In conclusion, child abduction cases stand out due to their international dimension, the critical emphasis on the child’s welfare, the potential criminal aspects, and the necessity for swift and coordinated judicial action across borders. The Indian judiciary’s approach, as seen in recent landmark cases, reflects a nuanced balance between adhering to international principles and prioritizing the child’s best interests.

What is your advice to parents dealing with international child abduction?

To make relocation easier for a child, my legal and practical advice to parents encompasses several key strategies:

Legal Considerations
1. Obtain Legal Consent or Court Approval: Before relocating, ensure you have the legal consent of the other parent or court approval. This prevents future legal disputes and ensures the move is in compliance with custody agreements.
2. Develop a Comprehensive Relocation Plan: Create a detailed relocation plan that outlines the reasons for the move, the new living arrangements, schooling, and how you will maintain the child’s relationship with the non-relocating parent.
3. Update Legal Documents: Ensure all legal documents, including custody agreements and visitation schedules, are updated to reflect the new living arrangements.

Practical Considerations
1. Prioritize the Child’s Needs: Focus on the child’s emotional and psychological well-being. Discuss the move with them in an age-appropriate manner, addressing their concerns and involving them in the process as much as possible.
2. Maintain Stability: Try to maintain as much consistency as possible in the child’s daily routine. This includes keeping the same school curriculum, extracurricular activities, and social connections, if feasible.
3. Facilitate Regular Contact with the Other Parent: Ensure that the child maintains regular and meaningful contact with the non-relocating parent. This can be through scheduled visits, video calls, and other forms of communication.
4. Create a Support System: Establish a support network in the new location, including family, friends, and professionals who can provide additional support to the child during the transition.
5. Gradual Transition: If possible, make the transition gradual rather than abrupt. This can involve short visits to the new location before the final move to help the child adjust.

Emotional Support
1. Counseling and Support Groups: Consider professional counseling or support groups for the child to help them navigate the emotional aspects of relocation.
2. Reassurance and Communication: Continuously reassure the child of their safety and the love of both parents. Keep open lines of communication to allow the child to express their feelings and concerns.

By taking these legal and practical steps, parents can help ensure that the relocation process is smoother and less disruptive for the child, prioritizing their well-being and maintaining healthy familial relationships.

What is your advice for parents who are dealing with a case of child abduction?

From an Indian perspective, parents dealing with a case of child abduction should follow a structured approach to ensure the child’s safety and legal compliance. Here is my advice based on recent and relevant case laws:

1. Immediate Legal Action: The first step is to file a complaint with the local police and obtain a First Information Report (FIR). This is crucial for documenting the abduction and initiating a legal response.

2. Habeas Corpus Petition: Parents should file a Habeas Corpus petition in the High Court. This legal remedy is designed to secure the immediate release of the child if they are unlawfully detained. In the case of Nithya Anand Raghavan v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2017), the Supreme Court emphasized the welfare of the child as the paramount consideration and the need for speedy resolution in such cases.

3. Invoke International Conventions: If the abduction involves crossing international borders, parents should refer to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, although India is not a signatory. The principles of the Hague Convention can still influence Indian courts, as seen in V. Ravi Chandran v. Union of India (2010), where the Supreme Court considered international norms while dealing with child abduction cases.

4. Custody Orders: Obtain interim custody orders from the family court. The recent judgment in Tejaswini Gaud v. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari (2019) reiterated that custody decisions should be made with the child’s best interests as the primary concern.

5. Mediation and Counseling: Engage in mediation and counseling to explore amicable solutions. Courts often prefer mediated settlements to ensure the child’s well-being and reduce trauma. The Delhi High Court in Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan (2020) highlighted the importance of mediation in resolving custody disputes amicably.

6. Legal Representation: Secure experienced legal representation to navigate the complexities of child abduction cases. An attorney with expertise in family law and international child abduction can provide valuable guidance and representation in court.

7. Support Networks: Utilize support networks, including family, friends, and professional counselors, to help manage the emotional stress associated with child abduction cases.

Key Considerations:
• Child’s Welfare: Always prioritize the child’s physical and emotional welfare. The Supreme Court in Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal (2009) emphasized that the child’s welfare is the paramount consideration in custody cases.
• Documentation: Maintain detailed records of all legal actions, communications, and evidence related to the abduction.
• International Collaboration: If the child is taken abroad, collaborate with international authorities and organizations to facilitate the child’s return.

In summary, parents should act swiftly and decisively, leveraging legal mechanisms, mediation, and support networks to address child abduction cases, always keeping the child’s best interests at the forefront.

 

Decision making model

Blogs from

Ankit Malhotra

Blogs from

Ankit Malhotra

International Law in Domestic Courts: A Note on Child Litigation in the UK

International Law in Domestic Courts: A Note on Child Litigation in the UK