International family disputes are rarely simple. When they involve cross-border relocation, unregistered marriages, and civil registry complications, they require immediate strategic legal action.
This case involved an Egyptian–Vietnamese couple who had a child prior to marriage. The couple later married and subsequently divorced. As part of the post-divorce arrangement, the mother agreed that the father would have full custody of the child in Vietnam.
However, following post-divorce tensions, the father requested to travel with the child to Egypt, claiming that the child’s grandmother was seriously ill. Shortly after arrival in Egypt, the father returned alone to Vietnam, leaving the child behind and effectively cutting off normal communication between the child and his mother.
The mother later discovered that the travel had not been temporary — it was a unilateral relocation. Communication was restricted, emotional pressure escalated, and the child remained in Egypt without the mother’s consent.
At this critical stage, the mother instructed Hassanein & Partners Law Firm, based in Cairo, to take urgent legal action.
Immediate Risk Assessment
Our first concern was procedural vulnerability. The father didn’t:
– Register the marriage in Egypt.
– Register the child within the Egyptian civil registry.
This created a potential legal gap. Without proper documentation, there was a risk of manipulation of the child’s civil status. We acted immediately to register the marriage in Egypt, closing any opportunity for unlawful alteration of the child’s legal identity.
Simultaneously, we encountered another obstacle:
The Egyptian civil registry refused to register the child’s birth because the child was born before marriage. Under Egyptian law, both parents must appear in person to complete registration in such circumstances.
While this initially appeared to weaken our position, we strategically reassessed the legal landscape. The absence of Egyptian registration significantly limited the father’s ability to impose a travel ban on the child.
What appeared to be a procedural barrier became a tactical advantage.
Legal Strategy Before the Egyptian Public Prosecution:
We proceeded by filing a request for a delivery decision before the Egyptian Public Prosecution.
Such proceedings are often complex, particularly when the respondent parent is outside Egypt. After extensive legal discussions and procedural clarification, the Public Prosecution accepted the request and initiated formal investigations.
Once law enforcement authorities became involved, the seriousness of the matter was clear. The father’s family approached the mother seeking resolution and ultimately delivered the child and his passport voluntarily.
After approximately three months in Egypt, the mother successfully returned to Vietnam with her son.
Professional Takeaways
This case highlights several critical principles in cross-border custody disputes:
– Custody rights do not automatically authorize international relocation.
– Informal or poorly structured post-divorce arrangements create serious legal exposure.
– Civil registry status can become decisive in international family disputes.
– Early, strategic legal intervention can reverse even highly complex situations.
At Hassanein & Partners Law Firm, we approach cross-border family matters with a combination of procedural precision, strategic foresight, and coordinated engagement with public authorities.
International family disputes demand more than litigation — they require legal architecture, risk management, and swift action.
In this case, timely intervention safeguarded both the mother’s rights and the best interests of the child.
Dr Mohamed Hassanein
Vice President- Pan African Lawyers Union- North Africa
CEO- Hassanein & Partners Law Firm- Cairo
m.hassanein@hassaneinlawfirm.com
+201202224217
Read more about child relocation and child abduction in Egypt.