Enforcement: 10 days of coercive detention
25 June 2020, 2 UF 200 19 (Bes. Haftbef.)
Coercive detention
The court ordered that the mother be placed in coercive detention for 10 days.
The court came to the conclusion that the mother’s behaviour left no other option but to force the mother to surrender the children.
The mother was not able to present any reasons which would mean that she was not responsible for her violation of the terms of the enforcement order. Setting a coercive financial penalty would most probably not achieve its intended aim as the mother stated herself that she had lost her job and no longer had any income. Furthermore, the mother is said to have stubbornly refused to return the children, and for this reason too, an attempt at enforcement by means of a coercive financiel penalty would most probably not achieve its intended aim.
Read more about International Child Abduction
Read more about child relocation and child abduction in Germany
Read more about the enforcement of a return order in other countries:
Choose your country
All blogs from The Author:
- Family Law Watch List (Airport Watch List) – Australia
- 11 Red flags for parental child abduction
- Golan v. Saada
- 12 months of suspended prison sentence
- The interests of children in the Divorce Act
- Temporary, but not
- No return during pending asylum application
- How not to involve the children
- No grave risk exception
- Article 15 Determination
- Return to Madrid ? No, to Spain.
- Habitual residence in appeal court
- Intolerable situation
- U.S. : Protective measures
- Rights of custody
- Compensation of court costs
- Monasky v. Taglieri
- Mediation in Germany
- Permission to move not required
- U.S. : enforcement of a return order
- Habitual residence
- Guides to Good Practice
- Mother had sole custody, but must return the child
- Chafin v. Chafin
- Grave risk, no return